On Mon, 31 May 2004 10:19:00 +0200, Michael Heiming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sounds good, albeit users are "experienced" enough to simply switch >off/on their tc.;) Ahahah Well I was stating something that I'd like to offer. Users tend to get confused and affraid when they see a message that they understand, especially if it's written at the console. >Yep, probably, albeit it doesn't matter (for users) why their tc doesn't >work anymore. Neither do mine. But we might think that as of a cosmetic issue. >Sure GFS or alike would offer better ha, but then I'm limited to run RH >ES 3.0 or SuSE SLES 8 >(http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs_distros.html), albeit I was >thinking about SuSE 9.1, the box is currently running SuSE 8.0. It would >need in addition 2 hba per system and need setup multi-pathing. I'm using Fedora Core1, and was able to give OpenAFS and CODA a try. Only oAFS has builtin binaries. >Another one could be ENBD (http://www.it.uc3m.es/~ptb/nbd/), haven't >used it with LTSP, but the author is a friend of mine, so I presume it >working quite well.;) Yes. In the HOWTO I illustrate how I use DRBD for that. I think the funcionallity is identical, same concept, etc. At least with DRBD I *know* it works (didn't try it ENBD). Whatever is your decision, I'm very interested of hearing from you: either for corrections/suggestions of the existing material, or, if you want to try other approaches, to extend the document. Mail me when you're ready to start! - Nuno Tavares ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Oracle 10g Get certified on the hottest thing ever to hit the market... Oracle 10g. Take an Oracle 10g class now, and we'll give you the exam FREE. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3149&alloc_id=8166&op=click _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net