CPH, there's 2 issues keeping us from creating a 2.6 kernel package for LTSP.
1) There's no nfs-swap patch available for the 2.6.x kernel tree. 2) There's not enough hours in the day to do everything we want to do. As for advantages in using the 2.6 kernel on the client, nobody has given me a real good reason why they need it yet. Jim McQuillan [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, CPH wrote: > I have not seen this mentioned on the list so far, so I was wondering what the > status (or outlook) is for using 2.6 on thin clients ? > Is there know issues for why it is not currently being used ? > Would there be significant advantages in using it ? > Is anyone currently using it ? > > Thanks > CPH > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE > LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click > _____________________________________________________________________ > Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss > For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _____________________________________________________________________ Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
