*Clap clap clap*

Very well said, and in the true spirit of open source development. Like
anything else, software projects will always refine themselves to cater
to new needs. They will also always have "competitors", but that never
means one is "better" than the other and the other needs to "play
catch-up". It means you have more choices, it's as simple as that.

We don't have to try and be the kitchen sink.


Cheers,
Jordan


Scott Balneaves wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 08, 2010 at 08:24:34PM -0800, Nicholas Metsovon wrote:
> 
>> I'm not a big fan of RedHat, but they seem to have far greater resources 
>> than most Linux projects.  I'm kind of curious if LTSP can benefit from any 
>> of this, and how it will affect LTSP in the long term.  
> 
> Myself, personally (and I fully realize I'm in no way a spokesman for LTSP), I
> would prefer us NOT to "benefit from" this project, if by "benefit from" we
> mean "subsume even more technology under LTSP's banner".  Here's why:
> 
> There's a couple of things that have been worrying me for the last several
> years.  I'm not sure I can precisely define what I want to say, but bear with
> me.
> 
> The first thing is the ever widening umbrella of "things" in which LTSP
> developers are having to become proficient in to be able to support LTSP.  
> LTSP
> started out as a nice, simple way to connect to a remote X server.  Think old
> style X terminals.  It worked *really* nicely, because it was simple: it did
> one thing, and did it well.
> 
> We've moved on from there.  Now we have our own display manager, we support
> local devices, by writing our own network file systems.  We've crafted a
> lightweight IPC using Xatoms for localapps.  Now we're going to have to talk
> DBUS and PolKit in order to get things done.  We're in the process of writing
> PAM modules to better clean up the code and support even MORE things people
> want (smart card auth, etc.)
> 
> Throughout all of this, the range of questions we're having to answer is
> getting wider and wider and wider.  Anything that even remotely TOUCHES LTSP
> now seems fair game for people to stop by the channel and ask questions.
> Classic case in point, today we're in there helping someone with shell scripts
> for setting up desktop links on all the users desktop.  This is OBVIOUSLY in 
> no
> way connected with LTSP, and I'm certainly glad we were able to help this
> person, but #ltsp is rapidly becoming (IMHO) a "black hole time sink" for LTSP
> developers and regulars.  Not getting an answer in #ubuntu or #debian or
> #fedora?  No problem, just wander over to #ltsp, they seem to have a lot of
> smart people over there who always answer questions.
> 
> I don't know about the rest of you, but it's becoming... worrying.  And the
> more we widen the umbrella, the more questions we potentially have to answer.
> 
> The second issue is one of (for lack of a better term) "Project Lifetime".
> LTSP is what LTSP is.  If RedHat's come up with a better mousetrap, something
> that beats LTSP at it's own game, I'd be happy to let them beat us.  Or, they
> have their product, and we have ours, and we co-exist happily.  But somehow, 
> if
> they've truly invented something better, I'm happy to let them be better.
> 
> This isn't a zero-sum game, and LTSP doesn't have to "win".  I'm sure the day
> will come when someone comes up with a revolutionary idea that supercedes
> everything we've done.  I guess what I'm saying is, the old adage of "If I can
> see farther, it's because I've stood on the shoulders of giants", when the 
> time
> comes, I'll be happy to be the shoulders, and let someone else see farther.
> 
> Just my own, personal, 2 cents.
> 
> In the meantime, back to writing pam modules.
> 
> Scott
> 



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev 
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to