Hi Harry,

I'm using Ubuntu 14.04 LTS out of the box, so I'm getting the Unity 
desktop environment which I think uses compiz does it not? Perhaps I 
should be trying other desktop environments such as Xfce and see if 
there's better performance? I've never tried metacity or mate.

Our users have been using the gnome environment forever so it will be 
work to use a new environment that doesn't use similar names for apps 
(like evince for example). Our current LTSP environment thats in 
production actually runs gnome on Red Hat and we just use LTSP to book 
the clients, but I'm now testing using a legit Ubuntu LTSP desktop 
environment and running into these performance issues.

Should I be concerned with video drivers that are on the LTSP server 
itself? Not just the thinclient?

Thanks,
mike


On 11/10/2014 02:49 AM, Harry Lavender wrote:
> Are you sure you're not using Compiz?
>
> Compiz is horrifically slow for us using LTSP, and isn't even slightly
> usable, so instead we use either metacity or MATE.
>
> Good luck!
> On 10/11/14 00:56, Michael Pope wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>> On 08/11/14 07:23, Mike Cammilleri wrote:
>>> So I've been experimenting with various hardware for our LTSP servers.
>>> Everything from VM's to this current Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2630 0 @
>>> 2.30GHz (12 core) with ~48GB of RAM. (Dell Poweredge).
>>>
>>> Thin client is a Zotac ZboxSD13-ID13 with 4GB of RAM and an Intel Atom
>>> D525 (1.8 GHz, dual-core).
>>>
>>> I have a 1gigabit connection all the way from the thin client to the
>>> LTSP server.
>>>
>>> Why are things always laggy? Multiple tabs in Firefox - will take 5
>>> seconds after each click for anything to happen. Clicking between
>>> windows has same almost 5 second lag or more. Of course watching a
>>> Youtube video slows everything down.
>>>
>>> I installed xosview to monitor the server and I do notice the network
>>> graph pegging at the top of the chart, but the actually numbers are just
>>> fluctuating from 6K to 5Mbit so I'm not sure network is the problem. But
>>> there is no way that this LTSP server shouldn't be able to handle a
>>> single thin-client efficiently. However I've seen this behavior on our
>>> other LTSP server configurations as well. I can't seem to track down the
>>> slowness - RAM looks good and CPU time is very low.
>>>
>>> Could it be a lag in the actual transmission of X (video) to my monitor?
>>> When I type this email the cursor is moving fine. If I type in Firefox
>>> its laggy again. I'm stumped.
>>>
>>> What should one look for when optimizing LTSP for performance?
>>> Everything I read says I'm doing it fine as far as meeting the LTSP
>>> server system requirements but I can't have users using such a lagging
>>> interface.
>>>
>>> Thanks for any advice!
>>> mike
>> If you install virtualbox and create a PXE boot VM you could do a test
>> like this and it would prove that it's your thin client hardware or not.
>>
>> Another trick I do is use my notebook to test as it has a better
>> graphics card than some of these thin clients and see if it has the same
>> problem when I use it to PXE boot from the LTSP machine.
>>
>> from
>> Michael
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
>>         https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
>> For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list.   To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
      https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help,   try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net

Reply via email to