On 5/6/2015 1:40 PM, John Hupp wrote:
On 5/5/2015 5:28 PM, John Hupp wrote:
For ease of deployment, I have the LTSP server getting its IP address
by DHCP, and so far I have been able to avoid referring to it by IP
address in various configurations.
But trying to set up fat client scanning with a server-connected
scanner, I have been following this simple tutorial for Ubuntu 14.04:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/SaneDaemonTutorial
The last step is configuring /etc/sane.d/net.conf for sane clients,
identifying saned hosts by hostname or IP address. I find that using
the hostname works on another standalone machine on the LAN, but it
fails with fat clients. So far I can only make fat client scanning
work by entering an IP address.
Does anyone know how to make the hostname work for the fat client? Or
is there another method altogether, perhaps something LTSP-specific?
(Before I started following the above tutorial, I had previously
simply entered SCANNER=true in lts.conf, but that did not enable fat
client scanning, so I deleted that.)
Trying to dig into this question, I find that the fat client can
successfully ping the server hostname, so it's not a name resolution
issue.
One interesting fact: Even on the server, sane-find-scanner (even if
run as root) reports "could not open USB device <id info>: Access
denied (insufficient permissions)." And on the fat client,
sane-find-scanner reports the same even when net.conf identifies the
saned host by IP address and Simple Scan successfully scans.
Then sane-find-scanner is broken?
Some exercises with 'scanimage -L":
On the server 'sudo scanimage -L' reports:
device hp:libusb:004:002 is a Hewlett Packard Scanjet 5200C flatbed
scanner
device net:192.168.1.8:hp:libusb:004:002 is a Hewlett Packard Scanjet
5200C flatbed scanner
If in lts.conf I enable SCREEN=02 to get root access on the fat
client, then run 'scanimage -L' on the fat client in screen 2 when
net.conf uses an IP address, it reports:
device net:192.168.1.8:hp:libusb:004:002 is a Hewlett Packard Scanjet
5200C flatbed scanner
Those devices presumably refer to /dev/bus/usb/004/002, which exists
on the server.
If I run 'scanimage -L' on the fat client in screen 2 when net.conf
uses a hostname, it reports no devices found.
I added back SCANNER=True to lts.conf, but this made no difference. I
imagine this configuration only enables scanners connected to thin
clients.
While of some interest, I don't see that any of the above tells me much.
Any ideas?
I noted in the original post that a fat client can ping the server
hostname successfully, and also that a standalone on the network with a
net.conf configured with the server hostname successfully scans with the
scanner server.
I thought those were very solid indicators that this is not a name
resolution issue, but I do get some indicators of that very issue from
host and resolv.conf output:
_server_ _fat client_ _standalone_
$ host <ltsp-servername> 127.0.1.1 127.0.1.1
<ltspserverIP>
$ /etc/resolv.conf 127.0.0.1
<ltspserverIP> 127.0.0.1
So indeed, the fat client and standalone are handling those differently
and I need to look at that. Credit to Michael Shigorin from the sane
list for pointing me in that direction.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
_____________________________________________________________________
Ltsp-discuss mailing list. To un-subscribe, or change prefs, goto:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ltsp-discuss
For additional LTSP help, try #ltsp channel on irc.freenode.net
