Hi Phill,

Yes I can. I'll test with standard Lubuntu 32-bit.

I guess the priority list should be what is possible with the

1. desktop installer

2. alternate installer

and the non-conventional alternatives can be tested with standard
Lubuntu and or Lubuntu Core

3. OBI (only booted from mass storage devices, typically USB pendrive)

4. 9w (booted from CD/DVD/USB drives)

-o-

I was not able to install Lubuntu Saucy with 128 MB RAM and any of the
conventional installers. The alternate or mini iso (netboot) installer
needed at least 160 MB. I could install with the OBI with 128 MB. I did
not try the OBI with less RAM. The text in that page is brief, and I
think it should state the limit for each installer. I expect that the
limits will be the same or slightly higher with Trusty.

Best regards
Nio

2014-03-14 21:19, Phill Whiteside skrev:
> Hi Nio,
> 
> can you ensure that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu#System_Requirements
> is up to date. 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Phill.
> 
> 
> On 10 March 2014 01:46, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com
> <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi again!
> 
>     A couple of friends at the Ubuntu Forums have helped us find the low
>     limit of hardware, when Lubuntu Saucy and Trusty can run (as installed
>     with the 9w installer)
> 
>     See this link (posts #76-79)
> 
>     
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2209683&page=4&p=12952191#post12952191
> 
>     Doug S wrote {
> 
>     Ventrical @ 166 Mhz and 80 Megabytes is not enough. Me at 200 Mhz and
>     115 Megabytes right on the edge, and while installation was fine,
>     operationally probably not enough.
>     }
> 
>     Best regards
>     Nio
> 
>     2014-03-08 13:38, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>     > [my text is at the end except the link]
>     >
>     > http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
>     >
>     >
>     > 2014-03-08 12:24, Ali Linx skrev:
>     >>
>     >> On 03/08/2014 01:30 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>     >>> 2014-03-07 01:53, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>     >>>> Hi,
>     >>>>
>     >>>> We want to try a new kernel for Trusty Tahr, that is developed by
>     >>>> PhillW. Many people help to build an Ubuntu based operating system
>     >>>> around it, a system that should work on most computers (maybe
>     except
>     >>>> some of those brand new ones that cannot switch off UEFI).
>     >>>>
>     >>>> We have a wide variety of computers, but have not found any
>     really old
>     >>>> one without PAE capability. I'm not talking about Pentium M and
>     Celeron
>     >>>> M, I'm talking about CPUs before Pentium II:
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Pentium Pro, Pentium (i586), or Intel 486 or maybe the
>     corresponding
>     >>>> generation of AMD from 1993-1997.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> I have an old computer from 1998, and it has a Pentium II CPU
>     at 400
>     >>>> MHz, so it must be older. Check for a clock frequency at or
>     below 200
>     >>>> MHz.
>     >>>>
>     >>>> If you are a happy owner of such a jewel, please help us test
>     that the
>     >>>> non-pae kernel really works in a computer without PAE
>     capability :-)
>     >>>>
>     >>>> Best regards
>     >>>> Nio
>     >>>>
>     >>> Hi again,
>     >>>
>     >>> After some [private] replies offering tests on old enough
>     hardware, I
>     >>> can report the following results:
>     >>>
>     >>> You can try the installer (to find out if it boots and runs in
>     text mode
>     >>> with really low RAM). An older computer might need less RAM for
>     drivers
>     >>> than my IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>     >>>
>     >>> *The Debian installer, live in an iso file*
>     >>>
>     >>> It starts in text mode and uses 18 MB RAM when idle  (and 22 MB in a
>     >>> newer computer with AMD Athlon dual core 4400+), but I have problems
>     >>> below 64 MB, set with the boot option (text is default)
>     >>>
>     >>> mem=48M
>     >>>
>     >>> in an old IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>     >>>
>     >>> it cannot unpack initramfs
>     >>>
>     >>> *Ubuntu Trusty installed system with Phill's non-pae kernel*
>     >>>
>     >>> The Ubuntu Trusty kernel needs more RAM, now after some
>     >>> testing I would say at least 64 MB, but I have problems below 80
>     MB, set
>     >>> with the boot options
>     >>>
>     >>> text mem=64M
>     >>>
>     >>> in the same old IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>     >>>
>     >>> When idling
>     >>>
>     >>> free -m  # shows 38 MB RAM used
>     >>> htop     # shows 39 MB RAM used
>     >>>
>     >>> but it seems more RAM is needed at some stage of the boot process.
>     >>>
>     >>> -o-
>     >>>
>     >>> The really old computers available so far have too low RAM,
>     except one,
>     >>> with a Pentium Pro at 200 Mhz. It has 128 Megabytes of memory. The
>     >>> computer was purchased on 1996.08.31. But it has a PAE flag and
>     should
>     >>> be PAE capable.
>     >>>
>     >>> I'm starting to think, that most computers if not all, that are old
>     >>> enough to lack PAE capability have too low RAM anyway for our
>     new Ubuntu
>     >>> flavour non-pae kernel.
>     >>>
>     >>> The outstanding exceptions are Celeron M and Pentium M, that
>     lack the
>     >>> PAE flag, but in most cases have PAE capability.
>     >>
>     >> Further to my previous reply:
>     >>
>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/2014-March/006876.html
>     >>
>     >> I have forgotten to mention that on this thread:
>     >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1590614
>     >>
>     >> I manged to install - trying again to save you the trouble to go
>     through
>     >> all the posts of that long thread - Linux on such super old
>     machine (P2
>     >> with 64MB RAM and 4GB HDD) by:
>     >>
>     >> 1- Taking the HDD out - because the machine itself has nothing to be
>     >> used to install Linux.
>     >> 2- Plugged the HDD to another machine.
>     >> 3- Linux installed - I wasted one month for this experiment
>     because more
>     >> than 50 different systems didn't work - check the thread.
>     >> 4- Disconnected the HDD and put it back in.
>     >>
>     >> One month, ladies and gentlemen. Yes, I learned a lot and proved
>     a lot
>     >> but the real result wasn't helpful for a daily use. Why? because
>     these
>     >> machines can no longer serve while we are in 2014.
>     >>
>     >> I was shocked when I managed to connect to the Wireless Network and
>     >> update the system. But that was the further I managed to go IIRC.
>     >>
>     >> See the thread if you wish:
>     >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1590614
>     >>
>     >> If anyone still think I'm wrong, see the thread :)
>     >>
>     >> And first thing you do, check the date of that thread: October
>     8th, 2010
>     >>
>     >>> Best regards
>     >>> Nio
>     >>>
>     >> Thank you!
>     >>
>     >
>     > Hi everybody :-)
>     >
>     > I see your points, I just want to explore things and find out myself.
>     >
>     >
>     > *. 9w - an installer for old computers
>     >
>     > So I uploaded a directory with an experimental installer and two
>     sample
>     > systems to install. The installer is based on a Debian system with an
>     > i486 kernel, and it can install any kind of [free] operating system.
>     > There are two sample systems which expand to 4 GB
>     >
>     > Lubuntu Trusty non-pae built february 23  'Ltrusty-npae-feb23.iso'
>     > Lubuntu Saucy PAE-for-Pentium-M  'LubuSaucy-pae2pm-4GB.iso'
>     >
>     > 9w comes as a hybrid ISO file, that works from CD/DVD and cloned from
>     > USB. So it is simple to make install media for most old computers.
>     >
>     > See this link
>     >
>     > http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
>     >
>     >
>     > 1. What computer will run at all, will be able to do some 'real work',
>     > etc? It might be worth the effort just for the sake of knowledge.
>     >
>     >
>     > 2. What computers are the target for a non-pae Ubuntu kernel?
>     >
>     > With the new fix in Trusty, [almost all] Pentium M and Celeron M will
>     > work with standard 32-bit kernel and the very simple tweak to add the
>     > boot option 'forcepae'.
>     >
>     > If all pre-Pentium II computers are out of the question, how many
>     > computers remain? For example: Are there motherboards, that are
>     non-pae,
>     > and are not helped by fake-PAE? Other problems?
>     >
>     > I'm thinking of Jörn's reply:
>     >
>     > -------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
>     > Ämne: Re: have you got a really old computer
>     > Datum: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:48:24 +0100
>     > Från: Joern <joern.schoen...@web.de <mailto:joern.schoen...@web.de>>
>     > Till: Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com
>     <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>>
>     >
>     > There also some CPUs that aren't PAE capable but were likely shipped
>     > with enough RAM, like some VIA ones, 1 or 2 versions of Pentium M with
>     > 1.2 GHz and the Transmeta Crusoe.
>     >
>     > Jörn
>     > --------
>     >
>     >
>     > 3. What computers are the target for ToriOS?
>     >
>     > - Is Pentium 4 and 512 MB RAM the low limit?
>     >
>     >
>     > Best regards
>     > Nio
>     >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw


-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Reply via email to