I will test that, but on VB.

Nice work!

Best Regards

On 03/16/2014 05:29 PM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
> Hi Lubuntu users,
> 
> This link (posts #88 and #89) describes a new and polished version of
> the 9w installer and the compressed image files available
> 
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2209683&page=5&p=12957586#post12957586
> 
> There are updated compressed images with Phill's nonpae kernel.
> 
> 1. An ultra-light text only system made from the Ubuntu Trusty beta 1
> mini.iso
> 
> dd_TrustyB1npae-text.img.xz
> 
> This system runs for me in an IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M with 80 MB
> RAM (set with the boot option mem=80M)
> 
> 2. A very light Lubuntu Core system made from the Ubuntu Trusty beta 1
> mini.iso
> 
> dd_TrustyB1npae-LubuCore.img.xz
> 
> This system is lighter than the previous 'Ltrusty' and runs with 128 MB
> RAM ... as shown by Doug S at the Ubuntu Forums: it runs but needs more
> RAM to do well while surfing the web :-P
> 
> -o-
> 
> Get the iso files and read the descriptions at
> 
> http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
> 
> 1_Help-to-run-experimental_9w-installer.txt -> README.txt
> 1477443584 mar 15 13:45 9w_multi-install_trusty-n-saucy.iso
>     439461 mar  7 10:23 GrowIt.pdf
>        343 mar 14 20:39 login-n-password.txt
>  708837376 mar 15 13:22 LubuSaucy-pae2pm-4GB.iso
>        991 mar 15 14:22 md5sums.txt.asc
>     101211 mar  6 17:40 mkUSB-quick-start-manual.pdf
>       4421 mar 13 21:53 README.txt
>  660602880 mar 15 12:44 TrustyB1npae-LubuCore.iso
>  530579456 mar 15 08:49 TrustyB1npae-text.iso
> 
> Welcome to test it and report your results in a real computer or in a
> virtual machine and at various levels of CPU horsepower and RAM size!
> 
> Best regards
> Nio
> 
> 2014-03-14 22:35, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>> Hi Phill,
>>
>> Yes I can. I'll test with standard Lubuntu 32-bit.
>>
>> I guess the priority list should be what is possible with the
>>
>> 1. desktop installer
>>
>> 2. alternate installer
>>
>> and the non-conventional alternatives can be tested with standard
>> Lubuntu and or Lubuntu Core
>>
>> 3. OBI (only booted from mass storage devices, typically USB pendrive)
>>
>> 4. 9w (booted from CD/DVD/USB drives)
>>
>> -o-
>>
>> I was not able to install Lubuntu Saucy with 128 MB RAM and any of the
>> conventional installers. The alternate or mini iso (netboot) installer
>> needed at least 160 MB. I could install with the OBI with 128 MB. I did
>> not try the OBI with less RAM. The text in that page is brief, and I
>> think it should state the limit for each installer. I expect that the
>> limits will be the same or slightly higher with Trusty.
>>
>> Best regards
>> Nio
>>
>> 2014-03-14 21:19, Phill Whiteside skrev:
>>> Hi Nio,
>>>
>>> can you ensure that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu#System_Requirements
>>> is up to date. 
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Phill.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 March 2014 01:46, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     Hi again!
>>>
>>>     A couple of friends at the Ubuntu Forums have helped us find the low
>>>     limit of hardware, when Lubuntu Saucy and Trusty can run (as installed
>>>     with the 9w installer)
>>>
>>>     See this link (posts #76-79)
>>>
>>>     
>>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2209683&page=4&p=12952191#post12952191
>>>
>>>     Doug S wrote {
>>>
>>>     Ventrical @ 166 Mhz and 80 Megabytes is not enough. Me at 200 Mhz and
>>>     115 Megabytes right on the edge, and while installation was fine,
>>>     operationally probably not enough.
>>>     }
>>>
>>>     Best regards
>>>     Nio
>>>
>>>     2014-03-08 13:38, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>>>     > [my text is at the end except the link]
>>>     >
>>>     > http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > 2014-03-08 12:24, Ali Linx skrev:
>>>     >>
>>>     >> On 03/08/2014 01:30 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>>>     >>> 2014-03-07 01:53, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>>>     >>>> Hi,
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> We want to try a new kernel for Trusty Tahr, that is developed by
>>>     >>>> PhillW. Many people help to build an Ubuntu based operating system
>>>     >>>> around it, a system that should work on most computers (maybe
>>>     except
>>>     >>>> some of those brand new ones that cannot switch off UEFI).
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> We have a wide variety of computers, but have not found any
>>>     really old
>>>     >>>> one without PAE capability. I'm not talking about Pentium M and
>>>     Celeron
>>>     >>>> M, I'm talking about CPUs before Pentium II:
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> Pentium Pro, Pentium (i586), or Intel 486 or maybe the
>>>     corresponding
>>>     >>>> generation of AMD from 1993-1997.
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> I have an old computer from 1998, and it has a Pentium II CPU
>>>     at 400
>>>     >>>> MHz, so it must be older. Check for a clock frequency at or
>>>     below 200
>>>     >>>> MHz.
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> If you are a happy owner of such a jewel, please help us test
>>>     that the
>>>     >>>> non-pae kernel really works in a computer without PAE
>>>     capability :-)
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>>> Best regards
>>>     >>>> Nio
>>>     >>>>
>>>     >>> Hi again,
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> After some [private] replies offering tests on old enough
>>>     hardware, I
>>>     >>> can report the following results:
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> You can try the installer (to find out if it boots and runs in
>>>     text mode
>>>     >>> with really low RAM). An older computer might need less RAM for
>>>     drivers
>>>     >>> than my IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> *The Debian installer, live in an iso file*
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> It starts in text mode and uses 18 MB RAM when idle  (and 22 MB in a
>>>     >>> newer computer with AMD Athlon dual core 4400+), but I have problems
>>>     >>> below 64 MB, set with the boot option (text is default)
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> mem=48M
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> in an old IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> it cannot unpack initramfs
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> *Ubuntu Trusty installed system with Phill's non-pae kernel*
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> The Ubuntu Trusty kernel needs more RAM, now after some
>>>     >>> testing I would say at least 64 MB, but I have problems below 80
>>>     MB, set
>>>     >>> with the boot options
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> text mem=64M
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> in the same old IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> When idling
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> free -m  # shows 38 MB RAM used
>>>     >>> htop     # shows 39 MB RAM used
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> but it seems more RAM is needed at some stage of the boot process.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> -o-
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> The really old computers available so far have too low RAM,
>>>     except one,
>>>     >>> with a Pentium Pro at 200 Mhz. It has 128 Megabytes of memory. The
>>>     >>> computer was purchased on 1996.08.31. But it has a PAE flag and
>>>     should
>>>     >>> be PAE capable.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> I'm starting to think, that most computers if not all, that are old
>>>     >>> enough to lack PAE capability have too low RAM anyway for our
>>>     new Ubuntu
>>>     >>> flavour non-pae kernel.
>>>     >>>
>>>     >>> The outstanding exceptions are Celeron M and Pentium M, that
>>>     lack the
>>>     >>> PAE flag, but in most cases have PAE capability.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> Further to my previous reply:
>>>     >>
>>>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/2014-March/006876.html
>>>     >>
>>>     >> I have forgotten to mention that on this thread:
>>>     >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1590614
>>>     >>
>>>     >> I manged to install - trying again to save you the trouble to go
>>>     through
>>>     >> all the posts of that long thread - Linux on such super old
>>>     machine (P2
>>>     >> with 64MB RAM and 4GB HDD) by:
>>>     >>
>>>     >> 1- Taking the HDD out - because the machine itself has nothing to be
>>>     >> used to install Linux.
>>>     >> 2- Plugged the HDD to another machine.
>>>     >> 3- Linux installed - I wasted one month for this experiment
>>>     because more
>>>     >> than 50 different systems didn't work - check the thread.
>>>     >> 4- Disconnected the HDD and put it back in.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> One month, ladies and gentlemen. Yes, I learned a lot and proved
>>>     a lot
>>>     >> but the real result wasn't helpful for a daily use. Why? because
>>>     these
>>>     >> machines can no longer serve while we are in 2014.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> I was shocked when I managed to connect to the Wireless Network and
>>>     >> update the system. But that was the further I managed to go IIRC.
>>>     >>
>>>     >> See the thread if you wish:
>>>     >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1590614
>>>     >>
>>>     >> If anyone still think I'm wrong, see the thread :)
>>>     >>
>>>     >> And first thing you do, check the date of that thread: October
>>>     8th, 2010
>>>     >>
>>>     >>> Best regards
>>>     >>> Nio
>>>     >>>
>>>     >> Thank you!
>>>     >>
>>>     >
>>>     > Hi everybody :-)
>>>     >
>>>     > I see your points, I just want to explore things and find out myself.
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > *. 9w - an installer for old computers
>>>     >
>>>     > So I uploaded a directory with an experimental installer and two
>>>     sample
>>>     > systems to install. The installer is based on a Debian system with an
>>>     > i486 kernel, and it can install any kind of [free] operating system.
>>>     > There are two sample systems which expand to 4 GB
>>>     >
>>>     > Lubuntu Trusty non-pae built february 23  'Ltrusty-npae-feb23.iso'
>>>     > Lubuntu Saucy PAE-for-Pentium-M  'LubuSaucy-pae2pm-4GB.iso'
>>>     >
>>>     > 9w comes as a hybrid ISO file, that works from CD/DVD and cloned from
>>>     > USB. So it is simple to make install media for most old computers.
>>>     >
>>>     > See this link
>>>     >
>>>     > http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > 1. What computer will run at all, will be able to do some 'real work',
>>>     > etc? It might be worth the effort just for the sake of knowledge.
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > 2. What computers are the target for a non-pae Ubuntu kernel?
>>>     >
>>>     > With the new fix in Trusty, [almost all] Pentium M and Celeron M will
>>>     > work with standard 32-bit kernel and the very simple tweak to add the
>>>     > boot option 'forcepae'.
>>>     >
>>>     > If all pre-Pentium II computers are out of the question, how many
>>>     > computers remain? For example: Are there motherboards, that are
>>>     non-pae,
>>>     > and are not helped by fake-PAE? Other problems?
>>>     >
>>>     > I'm thinking of Jörn's reply:
>>>     >
>>>     > -------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
>>>     > Ämne: Re: have you got a really old computer
>>>     > Datum: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:48:24 +0100
>>>     > Från: Joern <joern.schoen...@web.de <mailto:joern.schoen...@web.de>>
>>>     > Till: Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com
>>>     <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>>
>>>     >
>>>     > There also some CPUs that aren't PAE capable but were likely shipped
>>>     > with enough RAM, like some VIA ones, 1 or 2 versions of Pentium M with
>>>     > 1.2 GHz and the Transmeta Crusoe.
>>>     >
>>>     > Jörn
>>>     > --------
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > 3. What computers are the target for ToriOS?
>>>     >
>>>     > - Is Pentium 4 and 512 MB RAM the low limit?
>>>     >
>>>     >
>>>     > Best regards
>>>     > Nio
>>>     >
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
>>
> 
> 

-- 
--https://wiki.ubuntu.com/NikTh--

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Reply via email to