Hi Lubuntu users,

This link (posts #88 and #89) describes a new and polished version of
the 9w installer and the compressed image files available

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2209683&page=5&p=12957586#post12957586

There are updated compressed images with Phill's nonpae kernel.

1. An ultra-light text only system made from the Ubuntu Trusty beta 1
mini.iso

dd_TrustyB1npae-text.img.xz

This system runs for me in an IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M with 80 MB
RAM (set with the boot option mem=80M)

2. A very light Lubuntu Core system made from the Ubuntu Trusty beta 1
mini.iso

dd_TrustyB1npae-LubuCore.img.xz

This system is lighter than the previous 'Ltrusty' and runs with 128 MB
RAM ... as shown by Doug S at the Ubuntu Forums: it runs but needs more
RAM to do well while surfing the web :-P

-o-

Get the iso files and read the descriptions at

http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/

1_Help-to-run-experimental_9w-installer.txt -> README.txt
1477443584 mar 15 13:45 9w_multi-install_trusty-n-saucy.iso
    439461 mar  7 10:23 GrowIt.pdf
       343 mar 14 20:39 login-n-password.txt
 708837376 mar 15 13:22 LubuSaucy-pae2pm-4GB.iso
       991 mar 15 14:22 md5sums.txt.asc
    101211 mar  6 17:40 mkUSB-quick-start-manual.pdf
      4421 mar 13 21:53 README.txt
 660602880 mar 15 12:44 TrustyB1npae-LubuCore.iso
 530579456 mar 15 08:49 TrustyB1npae-text.iso

Welcome to test it and report your results in a real computer or in a
virtual machine and at various levels of CPU horsepower and RAM size!

Best regards
Nio

2014-03-14 22:35, Nio Wiklund skrev:
> Hi Phill,
> 
> Yes I can. I'll test with standard Lubuntu 32-bit.
> 
> I guess the priority list should be what is possible with the
> 
> 1. desktop installer
> 
> 2. alternate installer
> 
> and the non-conventional alternatives can be tested with standard
> Lubuntu and or Lubuntu Core
> 
> 3. OBI (only booted from mass storage devices, typically USB pendrive)
> 
> 4. 9w (booted from CD/DVD/USB drives)
> 
> -o-
> 
> I was not able to install Lubuntu Saucy with 128 MB RAM and any of the
> conventional installers. The alternate or mini iso (netboot) installer
> needed at least 160 MB. I could install with the OBI with 128 MB. I did
> not try the OBI with less RAM. The text in that page is brief, and I
> think it should state the limit for each installer. I expect that the
> limits will be the same or slightly higher with Trusty.
> 
> Best regards
> Nio
> 
> 2014-03-14 21:19, Phill Whiteside skrev:
>> Hi Nio,
>>
>> can you ensure that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu#System_Requirements
>> is up to date. 
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Phill.
>>
>>
>> On 10 March 2014 01:46, Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com
>> <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi again!
>>
>>     A couple of friends at the Ubuntu Forums have helped us find the low
>>     limit of hardware, when Lubuntu Saucy and Trusty can run (as installed
>>     with the 9w installer)
>>
>>     See this link (posts #76-79)
>>
>>     
>> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=2209683&page=4&p=12952191#post12952191
>>
>>     Doug S wrote {
>>
>>     Ventrical @ 166 Mhz and 80 Megabytes is not enough. Me at 200 Mhz and
>>     115 Megabytes right on the edge, and while installation was fine,
>>     operationally probably not enough.
>>     }
>>
>>     Best regards
>>     Nio
>>
>>     2014-03-08 13:38, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>>     > [my text is at the end except the link]
>>     >
>>     > http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > 2014-03-08 12:24, Ali Linx skrev:
>>     >>
>>     >> On 03/08/2014 01:30 AM, Nio Wiklund wrote:
>>     >>> 2014-03-07 01:53, Nio Wiklund skrev:
>>     >>>> Hi,
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> We want to try a new kernel for Trusty Tahr, that is developed by
>>     >>>> PhillW. Many people help to build an Ubuntu based operating system
>>     >>>> around it, a system that should work on most computers (maybe
>>     except
>>     >>>> some of those brand new ones that cannot switch off UEFI).
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> We have a wide variety of computers, but have not found any
>>     really old
>>     >>>> one without PAE capability. I'm not talking about Pentium M and
>>     Celeron
>>     >>>> M, I'm talking about CPUs before Pentium II:
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> Pentium Pro, Pentium (i586), or Intel 486 or maybe the
>>     corresponding
>>     >>>> generation of AMD from 1993-1997.
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> I have an old computer from 1998, and it has a Pentium II CPU
>>     at 400
>>     >>>> MHz, so it must be older. Check for a clock frequency at or
>>     below 200
>>     >>>> MHz.
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> If you are a happy owner of such a jewel, please help us test
>>     that the
>>     >>>> non-pae kernel really works in a computer without PAE
>>     capability :-)
>>     >>>>
>>     >>>> Best regards
>>     >>>> Nio
>>     >>>>
>>     >>> Hi again,
>>     >>>
>>     >>> After some [private] replies offering tests on old enough
>>     hardware, I
>>     >>> can report the following results:
>>     >>>
>>     >>> You can try the installer (to find out if it boots and runs in
>>     text mode
>>     >>> with really low RAM). An older computer might need less RAM for
>>     drivers
>>     >>> than my IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> *The Debian installer, live in an iso file*
>>     >>>
>>     >>> It starts in text mode and uses 18 MB RAM when idle  (and 22 MB in a
>>     >>> newer computer with AMD Athlon dual core 4400+), but I have problems
>>     >>> below 64 MB, set with the boot option (text is default)
>>     >>>
>>     >>> mem=48M
>>     >>>
>>     >>> in an old IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> it cannot unpack initramfs
>>     >>>
>>     >>> *Ubuntu Trusty installed system with Phill's non-pae kernel*
>>     >>>
>>     >>> The Ubuntu Trusty kernel needs more RAM, now after some
>>     >>> testing I would say at least 64 MB, but I have problems below 80
>>     MB, set
>>     >>> with the boot options
>>     >>>
>>     >>> text mem=64M
>>     >>>
>>     >>> in the same old IBM Thinkpad T42 with Pentium M CPU.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> When idling
>>     >>>
>>     >>> free -m  # shows 38 MB RAM used
>>     >>> htop     # shows 39 MB RAM used
>>     >>>
>>     >>> but it seems more RAM is needed at some stage of the boot process.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> -o-
>>     >>>
>>     >>> The really old computers available so far have too low RAM,
>>     except one,
>>     >>> with a Pentium Pro at 200 Mhz. It has 128 Megabytes of memory. The
>>     >>> computer was purchased on 1996.08.31. But it has a PAE flag and
>>     should
>>     >>> be PAE capable.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> I'm starting to think, that most computers if not all, that are old
>>     >>> enough to lack PAE capability have too low RAM anyway for our
>>     new Ubuntu
>>     >>> flavour non-pae kernel.
>>     >>>
>>     >>> The outstanding exceptions are Celeron M and Pentium M, that
>>     lack the
>>     >>> PAE flag, but in most cases have PAE capability.
>>     >>
>>     >> Further to my previous reply:
>>     >>
>>     https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/lubuntu-users/2014-March/006876.html
>>     >>
>>     >> I have forgotten to mention that on this thread:
>>     >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1590614
>>     >>
>>     >> I manged to install - trying again to save you the trouble to go
>>     through
>>     >> all the posts of that long thread - Linux on such super old
>>     machine (P2
>>     >> with 64MB RAM and 4GB HDD) by:
>>     >>
>>     >> 1- Taking the HDD out - because the machine itself has nothing to be
>>     >> used to install Linux.
>>     >> 2- Plugged the HDD to another machine.
>>     >> 3- Linux installed - I wasted one month for this experiment
>>     because more
>>     >> than 50 different systems didn't work - check the thread.
>>     >> 4- Disconnected the HDD and put it back in.
>>     >>
>>     >> One month, ladies and gentlemen. Yes, I learned a lot and proved
>>     a lot
>>     >> but the real result wasn't helpful for a daily use. Why? because
>>     these
>>     >> machines can no longer serve while we are in 2014.
>>     >>
>>     >> I was shocked when I managed to connect to the Wireless Network and
>>     >> update the system. But that was the further I managed to go IIRC.
>>     >>
>>     >> See the thread if you wish:
>>     >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1590614
>>     >>
>>     >> If anyone still think I'm wrong, see the thread :)
>>     >>
>>     >> And first thing you do, check the date of that thread: October
>>     8th, 2010
>>     >>
>>     >>> Best regards
>>     >>> Nio
>>     >>>
>>     >> Thank you!
>>     >>
>>     >
>>     > Hi everybody :-)
>>     >
>>     > I see your points, I just want to explore things and find out myself.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > *. 9w - an installer for old computers
>>     >
>>     > So I uploaded a directory with an experimental installer and two
>>     sample
>>     > systems to install. The installer is based on a Debian system with an
>>     > i486 kernel, and it can install any kind of [free] operating system.
>>     > There are two sample systems which expand to 4 GB
>>     >
>>     > Lubuntu Trusty non-pae built february 23  'Ltrusty-npae-feb23.iso'
>>     > Lubuntu Saucy PAE-for-Pentium-M  'LubuSaucy-pae2pm-4GB.iso'
>>     >
>>     > 9w comes as a hybrid ISO file, that works from CD/DVD and cloned from
>>     > USB. So it is simple to make install media for most old computers.
>>     >
>>     > See this link
>>     >
>>     > http://phillw.net/isos/linux-tools/9w/
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > 1. What computer will run at all, will be able to do some 'real work',
>>     > etc? It might be worth the effort just for the sake of knowledge.
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > 2. What computers are the target for a non-pae Ubuntu kernel?
>>     >
>>     > With the new fix in Trusty, [almost all] Pentium M and Celeron M will
>>     > work with standard 32-bit kernel and the very simple tweak to add the
>>     > boot option 'forcepae'.
>>     >
>>     > If all pre-Pentium II computers are out of the question, how many
>>     > computers remain? For example: Are there motherboards, that are
>>     non-pae,
>>     > and are not helped by fake-PAE? Other problems?
>>     >
>>     > I'm thinking of Jörn's reply:
>>     >
>>     > -------- Ursprungligt meddelande --------
>>     > Ämne: Re: have you got a really old computer
>>     > Datum: Fri, 7 Mar 2014 22:48:24 +0100
>>     > Från: Joern <joern.schoen...@web.de <mailto:joern.schoen...@web.de>>
>>     > Till: Nio Wiklund <nio.wikl...@gmail.com
>>     <mailto:nio.wikl...@gmail.com>>
>>     >
>>     > There also some CPUs that aren't PAE capable but were likely shipped
>>     > with enough RAM, like some VIA ones, 1 or 2 versions of Pentium M with
>>     > 1.2 GHz and the Transmeta Crusoe.
>>     >
>>     > Jörn
>>     > --------
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > 3. What computers are the target for ToriOS?
>>     >
>>     > - Is Pentium 4 and 512 MB RAM the low limit?
>>     >
>>     >
>>     > Best regards
>>     > Nio
>>     >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/phillw
> 


-- 
Lubuntu-users mailing list
Lubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/lubuntu-users

Reply via email to