Any thoughts on Lucene.Net/dotLucene package name are welcome.
I agree that Lucene.Net is a better name. It's more consistent with Lucene Java and Lucene4c, the names for other ports of Lucene. I think it's okay to reclaim the name of an abandonded project, especially if the abandoned project is better known and is substantially similar.
The only problem would be if someone else felt that the name Lucene.Net was their property. But the folks at http://searchblackbox.com/ don't use name Lucene.Net anymore. Also, I owned and used the domain lucene.net to refer to Apache's Lucene before the Sourceforge Lucene.Net project started in 8/03, which arguably gives me rights to the name:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.lucene.net/
Doug
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
