Some of the contrib stuff will be easier to port than others. Some of it relies on features the java character class has that .Net does not have. If my memory serves me correctly, it has to do with the character map, essentially java can tell you whig category it lives in, or Arabic, Chinese, etc. .Net only gives you is letter, is digit, etc.
There are a few other difficulties in the hyphenation package, as well. It won't be totally painless. I'm okay with not including it in the release and porting them later, either for the next release, or if people request it. I don't see any reason we couldnt do it as a separate release, if community demand was high enough. So, I'm a +1. For a release as is. +1 Sent from my phonograph, so there are likely some mistaken. ;) On Nov 19, 2011 3:55 PM, "Prescott Nasser" <geobmx...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > I'm alright with them being out of partity if only because it seems like a > lot of effort is moving away from 2.9.4. The core is all there > > > > If everyone else thinks otherwise, I'll start to update those, but > otherwise, I'd like to close the chapter on 2.9.4 and put some effort into > one of the other items people are working on. > > > > My hope is that 2.9.4 is quickly replaced with the next version - we have > spent a lot of time sitting on this at this point > > > > ~P > ---------------------------------------- > > From: thowar...@gmail.com > > Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 18:17:20 -0800 > > To: lucene-net-dev@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: [Lucene.Net] [VOTE] Apache-Lucene.Net-2.9.4-incubating-RC3 > > > > So, I haven't looked at the artifacts, but I was just looking over the > > source code, and noticed something that we should probably discuss > > before voting on the artifacts. > > > > The files in Contrib\Analyzers are nowhere near in sync with 2.9.4... > > Not sure how old they are exactly, but they are very different from > > Java's 2.9.4 Contrib\Analyzers. > > > > This looks like a relatively small amount of work to update. Do we > > want to make a release without updating those to be 2.9.4 compatible? > > > > Are there any other things like this lurking in Contrib that haven't > > been updated? > > > > Thanks, > > Troy > > > > On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 1:33 AM, Prescott Nasser <geobmx...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Third time is the charm: > > > > > > > > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~pnasser/Lucene.Net/2.9.4-incubating-RC3/ > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll keep it open for 72 hours or so, then if all goes well, I'll make > a vote to the general@incubator > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks everyone for their help getting to this point. > > > > > > > > > > > > ~Prescott > > > > > > > > > > > > +1
