oh, i see. i was misleaded by the Bean part of the SearchBean... im sorry! :-)
Anyhow, if it is not a Statefull SessionBean you are not restricted by EJB rules and can thus serialize everything you want to disk or db... mvh karl řie On Wednesday 03 July 2002 17:20, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: > I think you guys are not understanding each other. > Terry is talking about the code in Lucene Sandbox, not about EJBs. > > I don't use that code (yet?), so I don't know the answer. > > Otis > > --- Karl Řie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > if it is a Stateful SessionBan you will have to create an EntityBean > > implementation with the same functionality. And then in the EJB's > > load() and > > store() you will have to serialize the array. Or if it is a CMP EJB, > > just > > declare the array as a persistent field. > > > > > > mvh karl > > > > On Wednesday 03 July 2002 16:39, Terry Steichen wrote: > > > Karl, > > > > > > Just to clarify. I have an application that runs searches as > > > > requested by > > > > > users. The application is persistent across multiple requests, so > > > > there's > > > > > no problem creating it at startup. And, given the application's > > > persistence, there should be no problem storing it in memory to > > > > serve > > > > > subsequent requests. I just can't figure out how to modify the > > > > SearchBean > > > > > code to do this. I seemed like it would be simple, but try as I > > > > might, > > > > > nothing has so far worked. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Terry > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Karl Řie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Lucene Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Wednesday, July 03, 2002 10:34 AM > > > Subject: Re: SearchBean Persistence > > > > > > > if the array is of a serializable sort, just store it in a sql > > > > table !?! > > > > > > mvh karl řie > > > > > > > > On Wednesday 03 July 2002 16:22, Terry Steichen wrote: > > > > > I'm using Peter's SearchBean code to sort search results. It > > > > works > > > > > fine, > > > > > > > > but it creates the sorting field array from scratch with every > > > > > > invocation > > > > > > > > (which takes on the order of a second or so to complete - each > > > > search > > > > > > > itself takes about one tenth of that or less). While I can > > > > conduct > > > > > several > > > > > > > > searches in the same module, I can't figure out how to persist > > > > the > > > > > sorting > > > > > > > > field array between invocations of the search module. > > > > > > > > > > Any advice on how to do this would be much appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > > > > > Terry > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Sign up for SBC Yahoo! Dial - First Month Free > http://sbc.yahoo.com -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
