Ah, you may be right (no stack trace in email any more). Somebody recenly identified a few bottlenecks that, if I recall correctly, were related to synchronized blocks. I believe Doug committed some improvements, but I can't remember which version of Lucene that is in. It's definitely in 1.4.1.
Otis --- Yonik Seeley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- Otis Gospodnetic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > The bottleneck seems to be disk IO. > > But it's not. Linux is caching the whole file, and > there really isn't any disk activity at all. Most of > the threads are blocked on InputStream.refill, not > waiting for the disk, but waiting for their turn into > the synchronized block to read from the disk (which is > why I asked about cacheing above that level). > > CPU is a constant 50% on a dual CPU system (meaning > 100% of 1 cpu). > > -Yonik > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
