On Nov 11, 2004, at 1:47 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I tried that too and it worked. The issue is that our Operations folks plan to install this on a pretty busy box and I was hoping that Lucene wouldn't cause issues if it only had a small slice of the CPU.
I don't think that Lucene is causing the issue. I'd like to wait and see if others have opinions/suggestions on this issue. Again, what your example program is doing is unrealistic - you're hammering the filesystem and CPU by having infinite loops that do not sleep. If a minimal sleep works then I don't think you'll have to concern the operations folks with a bigger box.
Erik
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
