On Monday 26 July 2004 13:44, Ziggy David Lubowa wrote:
> When rolling out a product you first have to look at a couple of things,
> Acceptance and Convinience. I stand to be corrected on this as well, my
> view is that the whole sms thing is something you going to school the
> masses for a longtime.

Well, while SMS requires literacy, technically, it's the cheapest and most 
basic form of communication to phone owners, yet very rewarding to wireless 
providers.

Almost anything can be done on SMS nowadays, and wireless providers are now 
focussing on getting more out of the SMS service.

SMS will bring in more revenue streams to the provider than 3G and GPRS will, 
and customers will use it more because 3G and GPRS are too costly, let alone 
available on most of todays phones.

Some providers are already seeing millions of $$ monthly on SMS alone.

> As simple as we think SMS ( to some of us who have 
> used it for a while and also know the who schematics of it) it might not be
> to many, which means you might have many calls to your call centres for
> help.

That shouldn't be a problem. Call centre support is free (and comes in many 
languages).

> Look at SMSINFO and all the other SMS products  do you know how long 
> it actually took to sink in , even with all the advertising  many people
> still didnt understand the product, either it was syntax errors or didnt
> know which number or they need a whole lot of schooling to get it right.

Most of the time, it's more about getting the right product to the right 
people. As with all other services, if you identify something the masses 
want, they'll eat it up!

If you have 2 different markets, have a product suited for both markets. Don't 
expect to have a high-tech product and think both markets will accept it. 
Target the right product to the right market.


> These are some of the disadvantages of SMS i believe. Some people might not
> mind at all scratching those many times and sending a simple sms , it
> actually makes them feel that they have more control of there airtime.

There is a lot of money to be made in voice, but a lot with SMS too. Look at 
SMS, it's thin, cheap to the provider and user, and doesn't only come in 
English :).

The issue isn't whether users know how to use SMS, but how the content 
provider or wireless provider gets them to use SMS in the way most convenient 
to them. As mentioned earlier, create a basic product people want (like 
voice, a killer app.), and you'll get demand.

> Look 
> at companies who still use notebooks rather than Databases which have a
> point and click interface, what would you say is more convinient there ???

Well, computer literacy is harder to teach than writing (in some language).

> and how long do you think it will take them to accept  change ??

You won't always have support when it comes to change; these are things that 
will have to be managed slowly. Which brings me back to, create that killer 
app. that users need or want, and you have their attention.

The Internet has been in UG a long time; it hasn't seen that much following 
over the past 10 years, when compared to MTN and Mango that came in, and 
immediately got users to CHANGE from CelTel to them. Why? They had the killer 
app.

Users only want services that make sense to them. If it's expensive but very 
basic (voice), they'll still pay for it.

>
> i am basically looking at acceptance which i believe plays a big role in
> product roll out.

Develop the right content for the right market, and you will have created 
demand.

I mean, Microsoft is a clear example :).

Mark.


---------------------------------------------
This service is hosted on the Infocom network
http://www.infocom.co.ug

Reply via email to