hi Chris,
Ubuntu was probably made to do that; but do I have to just accept what others have done and not try to improve it? Where is our innovativeness? Shall we always wait for others to do and we only use? Imagine if Linus torvalds had sat back and said, "well, wasn't Microsoft made for that?" or " Ja, i suppose, Unix works, why should I want to do anything else?".
Its good to be innovative. If there is already something out there that does the job just fine, and is free, i'd probably go with that.
I only see that for a new lightweight debian based product, ubuntu is honestly just fine.
As far as I am concerned It is quite interesting even to find out how Ubuntu did their thing.
This is fine.
"reinventing the wheel"? Indeed? Earnest, have you thought about all the linux flavours? Why did we not stick to just one, or to good old unix?
because of the licensing, etc.. the two situations here dont compare...
Please do not discourage me; give me further ideas. You probably have brighter ideas!!
Not to discourage you really.. In fact, i'd say go right ahead! I only spake from my personal point of view. IMHO. from what robert described and from what he stated as the solution you're doing, i'd say just go ubuntu :)
ok, here is a better solution.. why not start with ububtu and modify/downscale/customize it :-)
ernest _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
