On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:40 PM, Simon Vass <[email protected]> wrote: > Kinda their own fault for selling their TEAMS stake before it landed, and > then acting all surprised when they do the same as Seacom! Got to be honest I > don't see Eassy making much of a difference
According to the WIOCC guys (who own some 35% of EASSy), they are mandated to bring costs down, it's the reason that EASSy was first mooted. When they come to market, the only way they are going to get market share (besides their owners, who are big telcos anyway) is to differentiate on price. TEAMS is crippled by exorbitant crossconnect fees in Fujairah...unless you pay those fees (20 USD per MB per month IIRC), its a cable to nowhere. -- Cheers, McTim "A name indicates what we seek. An address indicates where it is. A route indicates how we get there." Jon Postel _______________________________________________ LUG mailing list [email protected] http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/lug %LUG is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/ The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way. ---------------------------------------
