The only reason for doing anything is the love of doing it.

                                     Gary Digman

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael Thames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "lute net" <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>; "Denys Stephens" 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: memorization


>> Yes, I totally agree!!!!  So why is Paul Odette's next CD going to have
>> 3 Bach suites, and one Weiss.  Why did Nigel North, record the Chaconne
> and
>> a 4 CD set of all Bach, and one Weiss suite,  Edwardo Egüez  2 CD's of 
>> all
>> Bach?  and no Weiss.  I'll tell you why....it's marketed to guitarist's.
>>Not quite. It is a bit more complicated. People record >Bach because it is
>>the grandest achievement of human spirit and there is no >better measuring
>>tool for our ambitions/qualities.
>>Eduardo has an extremely fine CD of Weiss as well, >although his affinity
>>towards JSB is far greater than for SLW (I have it from >the horse's
> mouth).
>
>     No question, I totally agree with you concerning Bach as the ultimate.
>     I also, happen to know that no record company will invest in something
> that won't sell. They often times will tell the performer what, and what 
> not
> to play.  Record companies are not doing so well these days. Bach sells.
>  There are as of last count 6 billion people in the world, out of 6 
> billion
> maybe 100 million people play guitar in some way or another, and maybe 
> 3000
> play the lute. you do the math.
> Michael Thames
> www.ThamesClassicalGuitars.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roman Turovsky" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Michael Thames" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "lute net"
> <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>; "Denys Stephens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2005 9:05 PM
> Subject: Re: memorization
>
>
>> > Stephan wrote,
>> >> Segovia (whom I admire greatly) did much to establish >the form and
> content
>> >> of the guitar recital format, which included playing from >memory, but
> it
>> > has
>> >> to be said that the content of his performances was >predictable.
>> >> There are only so many times that you want to hear the >Bach Chaconne,
> the
>> >> Villa Lobos preludes and so on before your ears glaze >over
>> >
>> > Yes, I totally agree!!!!  So why is Paul Odette's next CD going to have
>> > 3 Bach suites, and one Weiss.  Why did Nigel North, record the Chaconne
> and
>> > a 4 CD set of all Bach, and one Weiss suite,  Edwardo Egüez  2 CD's of
> all
>> > Bach?  and no Weiss.  I'll tell you why....it's marketed to 
>> > guitarist's.
>> Not quite. It is a bit more complicated. People record Bach because it is
>> the grandest achievement of human spirit and there is no better measuring
>> tool for our ambitions/qualities.
>> Eduardo has an extremely fine CD of Weiss as well, although his affinity
>> towards JSB is far greater than for SLW (I have it from the horse's
> mouth).
>> He also recorded De Visee, equally beautifully.
>>
>> > All this for an instrument Bach never wrote anything for in the first
>> > place, all transcriptions, just like the guitar.
>> > Michael Thames
>> All Bach is a transcription, just because it is absolute music and no
>> instrument could do it absolute justice.
>> RT
>> ________________
>> http://polyhymnion.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>
>
>
>
> 



Reply via email to