Are you saying that there are no pieces in CLM that do not have attributions? Also, I must disagree with your characterization of my position concerning Holmes, that's simply not the case, each piece is taken on a case by case basis, such as Farewell Fancy. dt
At 11:55 AM 7/24/2008, you wrote: >David Rastall wrote: >>On Jul 24, 2008, at 9:53 AM, Robert Margo wrote: >> >>>I think Mr. Tayler is referring to the 14th piece in Francisque >>>(counting >>>from the beginning of the book). I played it this morning. It is >>>definitely a Dowland theme. >>That's what I was thinking. It's a Dowland theme, which Francisque >>took and wrote a galliard on it. Does that make it a "piece by >>Dowland?" > >Of course, Diana Poulton knew of this setting - see her biography, >pp 62, 289 and 489. > >It is well known that David Tayler doesn't accept the Holmes >manuscripts or Variety as reliable sources for Dowland's music. > >Why on earth does he think Dowland has anything to do with this >setting of CLM19 that is simply called "Galliarde" and not >attributed to anybody by Francisque. > >Rainer adS > > > > >To get on or off this list see list information at >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
