Hello Tim:

Yes , they are WILDLY inaccurate...
What I do is (and hopefully it is ok enough) is to have 2 units in the shop. when it is driest in So Ca (usually Sept. through winter - this is wo factoring in rainy spells ) I read the relative humidity on both meters as being in the shop (they track eachother within 4 percent or so- in absolute terms to get a basic idea of where I am. Usually they read in the high 30's and on the coldest and driest day in winter in the high 20's. but as you say , I really have know idea as to the exact percentage of humidity relative to a lab standard of any kind. I then take the average between the two so that When its time to do the work and knowing the time of year , I usually can tell basically what I'm up against first via the Tamotz meter (I use one myself - calibrated sinus's that is ) and then what I am being told via the meters. I also consult a local weather site in altadena nearby the house (they are on line) to keep myself within bounds, This roundabout method though depends on whether or not the units while not accurate in absolute terms , are pretty accurate relatively - that is that they track the rise and fall of humidity reasonably well and maintain a fair consistency one to the other (which they do) . With this in mind , whichever one winds up in the box I know what to factor in pretty much as far as the one outside in the shop.. If the one in the shop says 45 percent , and I know its just about as dry out there as its probably going to get and its Sept / Oct(so the correct reading should be actually in the 30's somewhere ) , and the weather station says that relative Humidity for my area is about 35 percent anyway, I will glue the braces at 41percent as read from the one inside the box while taking into account the tracking factor between the unit in the shop which is reading 45. . I absolutely agree that the equilibrium is very important.. especially for the first number of hours as the glue is setting up and not at its maximum hardness.. I peek in through a crack in the box and unplug the lamp if the humidity starts to climb etc
What Art Museum do you work at?
This is wonderful work.. I attended a lecture on the restoration of a Titian at the Getty here some time ago as given by the principle restorer there, as well a lecture for the restorers at LAMCA on Rembrandt by Ernst Van De Wetering of the Rembrandt Research Project.. I am a trained Painter myself ( teach periodically at Art Center College of Design here in Pasadena) and am always interested in the restorers trade- its endlessly fascinating.

r







From: <tam...@buckeye-express.com>
To: <rel...@sbcglobal.net>
Cc: <chagorra...@yahoo.com>; <lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 1:11 PM
Subject: Re: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: hide glue gram strength


R,
My go-bar box is a four foot cube (plywood top and bottom with threaded rods in the corners holding them apart). I've cut the foam core so that three sides are solid but the front opens from the middle, which makes it less cumbersome to get into. The foam core pieces are held together by blue painter's tape. The whole thing knocks down for storage when I don't need it. I have a recycled ceramic light fixture screwed to the ceiling of the box and a low wattage bulb in the fixture. I experimented with different wattages to find what keeps the interior of the box warm without an increasing build-up of heat. You essentially want to reach an equilibrium between the heat radiated by the light bulb and the the radiation of heat out of the box into the room. So the wattage will be different depending on the size of your box, the amount of insulation around it, and the air temperature of your room. You do want some air flow so the warm moist air from gluing will vent out of the box. I just keep the box closed and the light on for several days while I'm gluing to maintain the equilibrium. That's not as good as doing the braces all at once, but I can only devote small amounts of time to this in any one day anyway.

Like you I try to work quickly when I glue on the braces, but I figure that the atmospheric humidity from the box being open is going to be less of a factor than will the moisture from the glue.

I haven't gone to the trouble of putting a humidity gauge in the box because the ones available to the consumer are wildly inaccurate. I work in an art museum and the conservation staff there use lab-grade meters. They say that consumer-level meters will only give you a hazy idea of what the humidity is. Your sinuses can probably do that about as well. If I was making lutes for sale I would probably go to more trouble.

Tim

--- rel...@sbcglobal.net wrote:

From: <rel...@sbcglobal.net>
To: "Santiago Ramos-Collado" <chagorra...@yahoo.com>
Cc: <lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: hide glue gram strength
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 11:47:11 -0800

Hello Mr. Collado:

The Purpose of gluing on all the braces on the soundboard at once is that it
is easier then to control some very important factors.
First, one wants  to have the top normalized in a controlled environment
with respect to humidity. The humidity in the box should be on the low side
of of what you expect for the instrument to find most often . This
normalization is to have the top in such a place for around 5 hours or more
so that you know the top has been "stabilized" in sofar as its internal
moisture is concerned.
A go bar box as mentioned in earlier posts with foamcore surrounding it on
all sides is also what I use.
You want to work fast because when you open the box front up in order to
glue and place the braces, the relative humidity will change in the box as a
result of outside humidity being higher  (or lower as the case may be)  as
well as as result of the presence of the water in the glue itself.
One then seals the box as soon as possible so as to keep the relative
humidity constant inside... you will want to check  this from time to
time...
If you glue down several braces but not all, and want to come back to the
project at a later date, you will have to once again stabilize the top  to
the EXACT humidity  you used in gluing on the previous braces for 4 or 5
hours or so before continuing.. This is to say that you will want to be
within a percent or so. This is actually a pain to do, so its better to
brace the entire top at one go.
Also if the top is only partially braced say at 35 percent and is left open in the shop even 5 or 6 percent higher or lower for any period of time, the top may well take a set and bow in one way or another creating a potato chip
issue.. This is a REAL pain to flatten out.
Secondly, the reason for exact humidity here is that apart from trying to
prevent the top from cracking by bracing it in a slightly lower humidity
than expected for the instrument, you are most importantly bracing the top with an eye (or better said 'ear') to an even dispersal of moisture interior
to top, which translates to an even width across the entire top as it is
being braced . This will result in a completely relaxed top with NO built in
stresses as would occur if you were to  apply say several braces at 35
percent, and others at 40 percent humidity at different periods of time.
In this example where the humidity was at 35 percent , those braces applied
will fix the width of the top to be slightly less  than those  sections
braced where the humidity was in the 40 percent range because with more
moisture in the wood the top will want to expand in width in this section,
and braces put on in the 40 percent range will fix the top at this expanded
width.
This 5 percent differential   across the top(our example) will create
lateral tensions in the top which will adversely affect the sound  this
especially in the "tail" of the notes  , which after all is where the
mystery of the lute sound pretty much resides.
What happens is that as the harmonics imparted to the top from the pluck of the string decays after a period of time , the energy the harmonics create
begins to lessen to the degree that it will approach the level of energy
embedded in top by the built in stresses .. At this point the stresses will begin to dominate and restrict the top from vibrating in accordance with the harmonics as created by the pluck. The tail of the note will hit a point in
its decay and then seem to deaden in complexity, and then die altogether .
In general, instruments made in this way (classical/flamenco guitars too)
will tend to want only new strings - as older ones REALLY emphasize this
deadening effect of a badly braced top.

best

r
----- Original Message ----- From: "Santiago Ramos-Collado" <chagorra...@yahoo.com>
To: <qui...@earthlink.net>; <tam...@buckeye-express.com>
Cc: <lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 9:56 AM
Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: hide glue gram strength



  Greetings to all.

  I'm missing something here. What's the use of gluing all the braces at
  once?

  Best regards,

  S. Ramos Collado
  --- El mie 2-dic-09, tam...@buckeye-express.com
  <tam...@buckeye-express.com> escribio:

    De: tam...@buckeye-express.com <tam...@buckeye-express.com>
    Asunto: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: hide glue gram strength
    A: qui...@earthlink.net
    Cc: lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu
    Fecha: miercoles, 2 diciembre, 2009, 12:53 pm

  Chad,
  Well, it's a small anvil.  About a foot long.  A blacksmith's anvil
  would definitely be overkill.  I haven't actually glued on all of the
  braces at one go yet, but I think I may try it on the next instrument I
  build.  It does sound like a bit of a circus act, though.
  Re-gluing bridges (which, unfortunately, I've gotten some practice at)
  is about the one thing that I do use go-bars for.  I have a jig (I
  think jigs outnumber power tools in my little shop) to hold the lute
  horizontal and I slide it under the wall cabinets over my work bench.
  Then I have little go-bars I made from strips of beech that are sized
  to fit the center and the wings of a bridge.  So the cabinets act as
  the roof of a go-bar box, if this makes any sense.  Once I've done the
  gluing I slide the lute in the jig under the cabinets and stick the
  go-bars between the bottom of the cabinets and the bridge.
  Before gluing on the bridge I attempt to extend the working time of the
  glue as much as possible by pre-warming the bridge and the bridge
  location on the soundboard with an electric heating pad for about an
  hour.  The younger posters on this listserv may not have a heating pad
  around the house, but by the time you're in your 50s you will.
  I only have time to build instruments in the winter, when my basement
  gets rather cold.  So I've made an enclosure out of foam core for the
  go-bar box (that never gets used for go-bars) and put in an electric
  light to pre-warm braces and the soundboard.  I assemble the box at
  least a day ahead of when I'll start gluing, turn the light on inside
  with the parts to be glued, and leave it that way for several days
  while I'm gluing things together.  The glue pot is next to the
  enclosure and all of the gluing happens in the box.  It also serves to
  dry out the wood if there is any residual moisture.  Part of the fun
  for an amateur is figuring all this stuff out.
  Tim
  --- [1]qui...@earthlink.net wrote:
  From: "Chadwick Neal" <[2]qui...@earthlink.net>
  To: <[3]lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu>
  Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] Re: hide glue gram strength
  Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2009 09:49:09 -0500
  Hi All,
  Thanks for weighing in on this topic. I've been using 315, and I think
  I'm
  ready to order some lower strength. It's been good to use especially
  when
  you want the fast tack and I've adapted my technique to suit. I would
  never
  be able to use Tim's method of glueing the braces all in one go and put
  a
  board over top with weight. An anvil, Tim??? Wow certainly not a
  blacksmith's I'm assuming :-))
  No, It has a fast gel and even by the time I get the go bars on one it
  has
  begun to gel, one more bar and I can clean squeeze out from the first.
  For bridges, I like it both in construction and repair, especially the
  repair, when you have to hold the bridge by hand for several minutes. A
  good
  thinnish water ratio and it will hold fast. I have a really hard time
  waiting the full five minutes, perhaps, too much coffee in me. I
  usually
  fidget around after a couple minutes.
  I have veneered and all of the other operations, but you have to be
  fast!! I
  also like it for rib gluing, it's quick.
  Shrinkage though, I witnessed a old jar with a thin layer of dried glue
  crack a baby bottle!
  Chad Neal
  -----Original Message-----
  From: [4]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  [mailto:[5]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
  Of Andrew Hartig
  Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 4:46 PM
  To: [6]lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  Subject: [LUTE-BUILDER] hide glue gram strength
     I'm wondering what gram strength glue other builders out there are
     using. I noticed recently that while a local luthier supply
  (lmii.com)
     sells 192 gram strength "high clarity" (it really does have high
     transparency) hide glue as their standard for lutherie, another
  general
     woodworking company (toolsforworkingwood.com) markets 3 types: 192,
     251, and 315 (only the 192 comes with a "high clarity" alternative).
     The only thing that really got my attention here was their
  description
     of the strengths, copied below:
       * The 192 gram strength is a good general purpose glue, and it's
  the
         least expensive hide glue around. That's why it's the most
  common.
         Its real application is veneering, although you can use it for
         regular gluing in a pinch. A lot of people consider it the best
         all-around glue for general woodworking (including veneering),
         because it also has the longest open time. If you are new to
  hide
         glue, this is the grade you should get.
       * The 251 gram strength glue is traditionally the most appropriate
         for regular cabinetwork. Its higher strength means that you can
  do
         rub joints more easily, and clamped joints will have less time
  to
         creep. But it's not optimal for veneering, when you'd want the
         maximal amount of time for squeezing out the excess glue.
       * The 192 gram strength "high clarity" is more expensive than its
         cousins because it is especially refined for maximum
  transparency.
         It's a good all-around glue that's slightly more tacky then the
         regular 192 glue. This is the glue to use if you are worried
  about
         visible glue lines.
       * The 315 gram strength is a special purpose glue for very high
         stress applications. It is favored primarily by instrument
  makers
         for situations where a joint will be under constant force. Of
  the
         glues the 315 has the shortest open time.
     So, is 192 not strong enough for lutherie, as implied by the
     description of the 315? Or is the concern here more about
  high-tension
     modern instruments?
     What are others using?
     (As an aside, I should mention that I've had no troubles so far with
     using the high clarity 192.)
     Curiously,
     Andrew
     --
  To get on or off this list see list information at
  [7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
    __________________________________________________________________

  !Obten la mejor experiencia en la web!
  Descarga gratis el nuevo Internet Explorer 8
  http://downloads.yahoo.com/ieak8/?l=e1 --

References

  1. http://e1.mc582.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=qui...@earthlink.net
  2. http://e1.mc582.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=qui...@earthlink.net
  3.
http://e1.mc582.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  4.
http://e1.mc582.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  5.
http://e1.mc582.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  6.
http://e1.mc582.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=lute-buil...@cs.dartmouth.edu
  7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html








Reply via email to