Regarding nails on gut strings--even people like Segovia used nails on
   gut for decades. I like those early recordings of modern guitars strung
   with gut. I think nylon strings came about after WWII.
   Sterling
   On Tuesday, December 10, 2013 7:46 PM, Sean Smith <lutesm...@mac.com>
   wrote:
   Just to be sure, he used nails on _gut_? Ragossinig, too? When I
   played those records in my childhood I always assumed they were nylon
   strings. When would JB and KR have moved to nylon?
   Sean
   On Dec 10, 2013, at 6:21 PM, Allan Alexander wrote:
   Sean
   Bream used nails, so I guess it started. So does Ragossnig
   Allan
   >
   > Since there appear to be lute players who use nails - a club I
   haven't
   > joined and now I'm curious - I wonder if there are there people who
   > use all gut and nails.
   >
   > Could they tell us their experience on how it affects the the life of
   > the strings? Do they [the strings] wear excessively? Do the thinner
   > ones need more frequent changing than the thicker gut strings? After
   > they wear a bit and perhaps fray, is the intonation affected? If so,
   > how?
   >
   > Wait, I thought of another. How about you orpharion and bandora
   > players - do you use nails?
   >
   > Sean
   >
   > ps. we seem to be on a topic of nails (tho I can readily see the
   > connection to the Bream thread) so forgive me for re-subjecting this
   > offshoot of the thread. If it helps feel free to respond to Bruno's
   > post as well under it.
   >
   >
   > On Dec 10, 2013, at 5:29 PM, Bruno Correia wrote:
   >
   >  It may sound good to you, but not for most of the lutenists out
   > there.
   >  Ask Hoppy about this issue? Ok, you don't need to ask him, after
   >  all you don't ride a horse to the gig... Hey, I'd like to do that,
   >  the traffic has been so bad nowadays.
   >
   >  The most frequent word to describe the lute's sound is sweetness!
   >  How can you have achieve it with nails? Double strings also require
   >  that both strings be pressed at once and not one after the other.
   >  The lute is after all a sweet instrument (specially with gut). Even
   >  in
   > classical
   >  guitar tutors (19th-20th century) the issue of nails was still
   > rolling
   >  on. Sor hated it and only tolerated Aguado because of his great
   > skill.
   >  That's why Tarrega and Pujol also avoided it (even if it was a
   >  requirement due to the high tension of the Torres guitar).
   >
   >  Going back: The sources were just saying that many people were
   > careless
   >  about their sound production. In order to avoid it, what about
   > cutting
   >  your nails once and a while, washing your hands (daily if you can)?
   >
   >  2013/12/10 Mayes, Joseph <[1][1]ma...@rowan.edu>
   >
   >    I play the lute, archlute and vihuela with nails for the same
   > reason
   >    that I
   >    play the classical guitar with nails: because it sounds better!
   >    Of course, by that I mean it sounds better to me. Nails give the
   >    attack a precision that flesh does not. It also comes closer,
   >    IMHO to the sound usually described in historical sources as
   >    desirable on lute - silvery, tinkling, etc. Many sources tell us
   >    not to use nails - which they wouldn't have bothered to do if
   >    people were not doing it that way. I don't play with flesh, I
   >    don't ride my horse to the gig, and I don't attend any
   >    bear-bating. My $.02 Joseph mayes
   >
   >
   >  --
   >
   > References
   >
   >  1. mailto:[2]ma...@rowan.edu
   >
   >
   > To get on or off this list see list information at
   > [3]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >

   --

References

   1. mailto:ma...@rowan.edu
   2. mailto:ma...@rowan.edu
   3. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to