Gerry Reno wrote: > Joseph Mack NA3T wrote: > >> On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Gerry Reno wrote: >> >> Can't read your ascii diagram, but it seems like I've seen >> it before. Have you posted on this setup recently. >> >> >> >> >>> The general setup is a single Inet NAT Router/GW box connected to a >>> switch (multi-VLAN 801q capable) that connects to all the servers. The >>> physical servers for this discussion are two web servers, two sql >>> servers, one shared storage server, two email servers, two file servers. >>> For simplicity lets just focus on the web and sql servers and the shared >>> storage server. >>> >>> >> you have two directors balancing http,sql (maybe the >> clients access the http and the http accesses the >> sql), smtp. There is a file server. This is a standard LVS. >> There's no need for one network here. >> >> >> >>> Just need to setup LVS and keepalived on load balancers add a >>> POSTROUTING rule on the load balancers and drop the default route on the >>> real servers (do I have that right?) >>> >>> >> it's in the HOWTO. >> >> >> >>> Hints? >>> >>> >> looks like a standard LVS to me. >> >> Joe >> >> >> > Ok, I think the only difference is that the clients access the http > which accesses the sql, but the sql again is load balanced rather than > pairing web/sql servers. But you're right, basically standard LVS pretty > much. Back to the HOWTO... > > > Just some feedback. No go on QEMU. The networking is way too slow. Like 5x or more slower than Xen. So I'm thinking about some other ways.
Gerry _______________________________________________ LinuxVirtualServer.org mailing list - lvs-users@LinuxVirtualServer.org Send requests to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or go to http://lists.graemef.net/mailman/listinfo/lvs-users
