Quoting C Anthony Risinger (anth...@extof.me): > On Mar 8, 2011 5:52 PM, "Trent W. Buck" <t...@cybersource.com.au> wrote: > > > > Jon Nordby <jono...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > > On 7 March 2011 22:35, Stuart Johnson <stu...@stu.org.uk> wrote: > > >> There is OpenQRM http://www.openqrm.com/?q=node/180 > > >>> > > >>> But there are no ncurses and a simple web control panels for lxc > > >>> neither an IHM yet, unfortunately ... > > >>> That could be really nice ... > > >>> > > >> > > >> Thanks. I have seen openQRM, but looks overkill for what I want. A > > >> simple menu driven interface over ssh would have been ideal. > > > libvirt has pretty good support for LXC. Maybe virsh or the > > > ncurses-like/based UI that recently got committed to virt-manager is > > > something along the lines of what you're looking for? > > > > Is it really "pretty good"? A few months ago, when I deployed lxc (as > > in, lxc.sf.net) instead of libvirt, it was because the libvirt people > > said that their LXC support was bare-bones. > > Really? I'm soon to set it up again ... I had it running 2 yrs ago under. > 32 without much problem (but used this instead); at that time it _was_ > barebones. I hoped it'd be decent by now because libvirt pretty much rocks > :-) > > C Anthony [mobile]
I suspect if you just want a full system container it's ok. Especially now that the bug is fixed where when you log into console and logout. AFAIR the .xml config doesn't let you specify any device whitelist, esoteric network config, bind mount sharing with the host, etc. But sometimes you don't need that. -serge ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
