>> Meaning you think python would be too heavyweight? > Certainly as one approaches the embedded end of the spectrum, there's > something to be said for avoiding dependencies on large (compared to > busybox ash) interpreters. It'd be neat if I could deploy per-service > containers on, say, a router with an 8MB MTD and 32MB RAM, and using > python/perl/ruby/whatever would make that harder. Maaaaybe lua would be > a better fit; I tend to stick to busybox ash, since it's already there.
Perhaps we should be asking first, should an ncurses control panel be part of LXC or a separate project? If it's the latter, then its rather immaterial, although personally I would love it to be part of LXC. I want to able to install LXC on any Linux box, and start managing containers with the least amount of effort. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Colocation vs. Managed Hosting A question and answer guide to determining the best fit for your organization - today and in the future. http://p.sf.net/sfu/internap-sfd2d _______________________________________________ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
