Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.3dev.22

[Klaus Weide]

On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Ismael Cordeiro wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2000, Henry Nelson wrote:
> > That's why no one else has done it.  It's not worth anyone's time unless
> > it's important or *fun* enough for him/her.
> 
> I think I can understand that. What I can understand is the kind of excuses I
                                           ^not?
> get when I ask.

Like what?

Part of my "excuse" is that I (now) happen to prefer the old lynx/slang
behavior.  Just liek you prefer a changed behavior.  That doesn't make
either of us right or wrong.

> > Is it a "problem" still remains questionable.  
> 
> For me there is doubt that it was a problem. For the others it's, at least,
                 ^no?
> an incoherence between the behaviour of lynx/slang and lynx/ncurses.

Yes, it is an inconsistence between lynx/slang and lynx/ncurses.  It's
not the only one.  They have kind of different personalities.

The change you want would replace that inconsistence with an inconsistence
between old and new lynx versions compiled with the same options.
I don't think that is better.  At least, it's up for discussion.


    Klaus