Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | No. But this announcement came too suddenly after a period where
| > | > everything | was allowed.
| > | > Everything was allowed because none of you could restrain yourselves.
| > | > (And everything I open my mouth I get into a flamewar, so I let you
| > | > play.)
| > | | The very reason why the trunk have been instable is unicode. All
| > the
| > | new features and cleanups did not destabilize the trunk one tenth as
| > | much as unicode did.
| > No I think you are off base.
|
| You are. I was talking about the last five months, not the last week.
Yeah... and the unicode branch was merged 2006-08-14. Try again.
And counting remainging required unicode work as bugs is not exactly
fair.
| > So far none of the editing bugs has been
| > caused by unicode. copy/cut/paste, cursor movement faulty contents in
| > coordcache etc.
|
| And I repeat myself: these bugs have nothing to do with my cleanups.
| Look elsewhere for reasons.
Quite a few bugs in the qt4 frontend though.
--
Lgb
