Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | No. But this announcement came too suddenly after a period where
| > | > everything | was allowed.
| > | > Everything was allowed because none of you could restrain yourselves.
| > | > (And everything I open my mouth I get into a flamewar, so I let you
| > | > play.)
| > | | The very reason why the trunk have been instable is unicode. All
| > the
| > | new features and cleanups did not destabilize the trunk one tenth as
| > | much as unicode did.
| > No I think you are off base.
|
| You are. I was talking about the last five months, not the last week.
Yeah... and the unicode branch was merged 2006-08-14. Try again.
OK sorry, I was exaggerating a bit.
And counting remainging required unicode work as bugs is not exactly
fair.
I didn't say that. I said that unicode _destabilized_ the trunk. If you
look at the SVN logs you will noticed that I have done a lot of unicode
conversion.
| > So far none of the editing bugs has been
| > caused by unicode. copy/cut/paste, cursor movement faulty contents in
| > coordcache etc.
|
| And I repeat myself: these bugs have nothing to do with my cleanups.
| Look elsewhere for reasons.
Quite a few bugs in the qt4 frontend though.
Man, that's an entirely new frontend. Dialogs bugs are easy to solve.
Dialog bugs have almost nothing to do with my cleanups. You could even
help here. I never said it was perfect and I always called for help.
I _don't_ plead guilty for the pseudo situation that we face here.
Abdel.
