Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Enrico Forestieri wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 22, 2007 at 10:56:25AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> >>>>>>>> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>>> @echo off SET LANG=de_DE start "LyX" "lyx.exe" %* >>> Enrico> Are you aware that the console hiding code is no more in >>> Enrico> place, such that using a lyx.bat doesn't hide the cmd window >>> Enrico> anymore? >>> >>> And I guess this also means that people who preferred to have two >>> lyx.bat files for two languages, cannot do it anymore. >> >> There was a hidecmd.c wrapper in development/Win32 to hide the console >> window without any flashing. > > I don't know if anything changed in this domain recently but if I set > the SubSystem to "Windows (/SUBSYSTEM:WINDOWS)" as opposed to "Console > (/SUBSYSTEM:CONSOLE)" I don't see anymore the flashing console. > > Peter?
Yes, for a windows application /subystem:windows is the correct setting (it's a linker option.) But then when texing the console windows pops up, I assume that this could also be suppressed. > >> Its purpose, once renamed as lyx.exe, was >> to launch the real lyx, named lyxc.exe, but it would also let specify a >> series of env variables to be set (like the unix env command). This means >> that the user could have set different shortcuts for different languages, >> for example. Apart the non-flashing cmd window, its advantage over a >> batch >> file would be the possibility to embed an icon in it. > > What is the problem of embedding the icon into the lyx.exe executable > directly? Isn't this the job of a resource file? > > Abdel. > -- Peter Kümmel
