On 19-May-2000 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
>>>>>> "Dekel" == Dekel Tsur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Dekel> Right now checking if a document has only one language is a
> Dekel> costly operation. However, I can add a boolean member variable
> Dekel> to class Buffer, which will store if the buffer is
> Dekel> multi-lingual or not (the variable will not be 100% accurate,
> Dekel> but it doesn't matter).
>
> At least, the language should not be displayed if it is the
> document-wide language (like the font is not shown if it is the
> default font).
>
Agreed!
>>> Also, I do not think that "american" is a proper default language.
>>> "English" would be better, but I really preferred the old
>>> "default". What was the problem with that?
>
> Dekel> There is no language named "default". Maybe we should use
> Dekel> "English (American)" instead?
>
And 'American' or 'English (American)' may by your default language it isn't
my for sure and for a whole lot of other people around the world #:O)
> I guess we should have a "default" language. We already have an
> "ignore" language, I do not know what the difference is.
Agreed too! The default language in LaTeX terms is the language which my
LaTeX installation has as default. So "default" here means just ignore it
I don't care about that! So we should have this (we have it as selection
in the Document->Layout, so IMO that we should have this in the character
Layout too and it just says don't set the language let it as the document
default language! Some sort of reset it to default!)
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel: +39-0471-450260
I-39100 Bozen Fax: +39-0471-450296
ITALY Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
If I don't see you in the future, I'll see you in the pasture.
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
