> Note that my patch shows the LFUN argument not the LateX code, so it won't
show the \left and
> \right. For example it will show:
>
> { }
> { Vert
> bigl \{ bigr \Vert
>
> I think it is useful to teach the user about the LFUNs. So it is not strictly
about LateX; I
> should probably rename the different variables in consequence.
OK, when you want to teach the users to learn the LFUNs then please rename the label from "TeX-code"
to "LFUN" but isn't this more confusng? I even don't know what the abbreviation LFUN stand for. Not
many users know what LFUNs are and for what they are needed.
> If you really insist that your patch is better, put it in ;-). I don't mind
very much.
OK, I'll provide an improved version of my patch that also shows the code for
\big etc.
regards Uwe
