Uwe Stöhr wrote:
> Note that my patch shows the LFUN argument not the LateX code, so it
won't show the \left and
> \right. For example it will show:
>
> { }
> { Vert
> bigl \{ bigr \Vert
>
> I think it is useful to teach the user about the LFUNs. So it is not
strictly about LateX; I
> should probably rename the different variables in consequence.
OK, when you want to teach the users to learn the LFUNs then please
rename the label from "TeX-code" to "LFUN"
Year, I already said that I should do something like that.
but isn't this more confusng?
I even don't know what the abbreviation LFUN stand for. Not many users
know what LFUNs are and for what they are needed.
Well, The fact that not many users do not know about LFUNs does not mean
that they should not know. I at least am glad to know what LyX is really
doing. For example, all the LFUN lanched via the menu are displayed in
the status bar. And you know that we have a mini-buffer that is useful
for other things right?
> If you really insist that your patch is better, put it in ;-). I
don't mind very much.
OK, I'll provide an improved version of my patch that also shows the
code for \big etc.
Hum... then why not just take my patch?
Abdel.
