problem is there is no "Real" glossary package. The most common one was (and still is) nomencl.
I can add/ switch to support for a better glossary package. But the question is which one.. If there would be any concensus on which glossary package to switch for, I will happily implement it. glossary.sty is not common, either. It has never been default in my distros. Ugras On 4/24/07, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>>> "Ozgur" == Ozgur Ugras BARAN < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Ozgur> Well, good point :-) You are right about this consistency Ozgur> issue. I just wanted remind an old (and rather short) Ozgur> discussion about this topic. That's why it might be wise to rethink the package choice and switch to a real glossary package of some sort. Would it really be more complicated to use the basic glossary.sty package? JMarc
