Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:19:19PM +0200, Jan Peters wrote: > > ... and the symbolic math is much more complete. > > This is true, and this will stay so for a while I am afraid. It's a lot > of grunt work to be done in this area, especially if one wants to be > open for different CAS backends.
Maybe some code could be ripped off from TeXmacs (http://www.texmacs.org/) which is written in C++ and Scheme? > > It was only their lack of innovation has allowed us to come that > > allowed LyX to get that close ;) > > And probably LyX throwing some ballast over board, and getting a few > active developers again. Which might be related somehow... Lesson #1: Stay focused. Andreas
