On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 12:07:05AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Enrico" == Enrico Forestieri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Enrico> On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:37:48PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes > Enrico> wrote: > >> >>>>> "Bo" == Bo Peng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> > Bo> I can not imagine anything else you might want to experiment in > Bo> 1.6.0. > >> Get rid of the corners and use background instead in order to > >> avoid those extra blank pixels? > > Enrico> What when insets are nested? Are you proposing to use a > Enrico> different colour for each nested inset? Nah... > > Only change the color of the deepest inset.
So, there would be no difference in simply showing the corners of the deepest inset. > Enrico> What about my suggestion in the other thread? > > I'd have to install texmacs to understand it. You don't need to. Simply draw the corners of the active inset without reserving space for them. If you are leaving an inset using arrow left or right and this inset is nested in another inset, show the corners of the new inset but don't move the cursor. When leaving an inset with arrow left/right, you actually move the cursor only if there is no containing inset. Even if the cursor is not moved, it logically belongs to an inset or another. Which one you can tell by looking at the status line. -- Enrico
