On 21-Jun-2000 Baruch Even wrote:
>
> This will not only help me, I'm pretty sure there are many other places
> where they won't install something that is officially marked as a release
> version. It is a problem to see a program with version 1.1.4fix3, one may
> consider if its development team is so incapable so as to need three
> consequtive "urgent" fixes. In the proposed method we will simply have
> 1.2.x for the the stable and 1.3.x for the development, with backports to
> update the older version, the transition will be to rename 1.1.6 to 1.2.0
> when the time comes for its release and the new devel version will be
> 1.3.0.
Lars what do you say? I support this idea and it's not difficult for us to
release it that way. We just reaname 1.1.6 to 1.2.0 on release and then the
new cvs will be 1.3.0 and if we release this it will be 1.4.0 fixes are
released by the last number!
Jürgen
--
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
Dr. Jürgen Vigna E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Italienallee 13/N Tel/Fax: +39-0471-450260 / +39-0471-450296
I-39100 Bozen Web: http://www.sad.it/~jug
-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._-._
"... freedom ... is a worship word..."
"It is our worship word too."
-- Cloud William and Kirk, "The Omega Glory", stardate unknown
