Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| Lars> The point then is "If you want to compile"
| 
| Hmm, where are the binary distributions (other than rpm)?
| 
| Lars> So you want us to use gcc 2.7.x still? Don't take advantage of
| Lars> the C++ standard library, templates and such?
| 
| Let's say keeping 2.8.x for some time would be nice.

And we are still supporting gcc 2.8.x, but probably not for very
wrong.

| Lars> RFCs can also be wrong. 
| 
| ... whereas ISO standards are never wrong :)

of course ISO standards can be wrong/be buggy. but not on the topic we
are flaming about now.

        Lgb

Reply via email to