On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:57:31AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > >If you had a serialization that > >would not require to implement these wrapper classes for new insets and > >that would 'just work' without additional effort (for example by using the > >insets read() and write() methods directly), then I think this would be > >ideal. > > That would be a good first step indeed. But I personally don't think the > hypothetical benefit of using "inset globs" in the lyxserver is worth > it. I mean, I agree this would be nice to have, this kind of thing is > even necessary for simulation programs where you definitely want to > separate the algorithm from the GUI but, in our case, I really think > this serialization is a typical case of over-engineering and we should > get rid of it. That's just my opinion of course :-)
Not just yours, but I guess you are aware of that. Andre'
