On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 09:45:13PM +0100, John Levon wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 07:45:21PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > > Of course this would emphasize structure and would not be acceptable > > > > by the finger painting faction as that's not what they used to. > > > > > > How do you expect a reasonable discourse when you characterize your > > > opponents thus? > > > > Why do you think I expect a reasonable discourse? > > > > The last few iterations of this particular discussion were not really > > productive, were they? > > I still don't see a reason to be quite so rude, but never mind. You were > always entirely intransigent on this matter. > > john
Perhaps Andre doesn't suffer fools gladly, in which case I sympathise. Not implying that you're one of those fools, but the refusal by so many on this list to accept a UI paradigm for LyX that matches hand-in-glove the natural structure of the feature concerned, the one that all the popular mark-up systems impose on their material (to spell it out: hierarchy, not bit strings), seems -- well, a little foolish ;-) Text-only channels are notoriously poor at diplomacy. - Martin
