On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:56:32PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 11:18:42AM -0400, Richard Heck wrote: > > >> The really nice thing about this proposal is that it saves us all a lot > >> of work. > > Actually I came to more or less the same view. > > So: > > - Noun should become an inset charstyle (lyx2lyx) > > - Strong should take a similar slot as Emph, i.e. > > a (non-inset) "font" attribute. > > But: > > - Code should be an inset charstyle. Something either > > is, or isn't, code. Objective meaning. > > Sounds like a plan? > > That's sounds good but JMarc doesn't want two different solutions. Or did I > misunderstood you JMarc? > > Abdel.
Yes, he wrote that, but this is't really two solutions as the char range side would only be a trivial extension of what we already have. - Martin
