Andre Poenitz wrote:
On Mon, Jan 07, 2008 at 09:31:58AM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:
Pavel Sanda wrote:
i also wonder whats the meaning of number-counting of the lfuns.
does anybody use it or can it be deleted too ?
I use it. It's very helpful for debugging.
Are you sure GDB won't directly gives the enum value? I think it did last
time I used that many years ago... Do you use it at the shell or within
some visual frontend?
GDB does give the enum values 'symbolically'. But people also use
'debugging by printf' as debug-enabled build takes ages to link...
Then maybe some override of lyxerr << is the right way to go. That's
better than printf, anyway.
The code numbers in lfuns.h will be a pain if we're trying to keep the
list organized.
rh
