> I'm not familiar with doxygen, so just look at the example at the end as > something intended to illustrate what I mean. Basically I suggest allowing > the LFUN enums to be unsorted, but let the documentation of the LFUN refer > to small documentation sections that describe the category to which the > LFUN belongs. For instance, the LFUN 'char-backward' could refer to a > section that describes LFUNs that are related to cursor movement in > general. This section could for instance explain what 'backward' means when > using RTL. If we are ambitious, this section could also list the LFUNs > related to cursor movement.
now i understand :) sounds too ambitious to me - in other words feel free to do it if you have time. from my pov it will take quite long time to complete even the current doxy style... > My hope is that by referring to the sections I mentioned above, we don't > feel it is necessary to sort them now. (If we do sort them, I think they > should be sorted alphabetically). either sort it thematically or let it be. the alphabetical sort in the final output can be crafted be some script. pavel
