José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 09 April 2008 09:18:35 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: >> Would it be really more difficult to support that through the include >> inset? Will it be easy later on to go from your solution to a 'proper' >> solution (whatever it may be?) > > I think this is in line with the figure and external insets merge that has > been discussed so may times in the past.
OK. JMarc
