José Matos wrote: > I agree with you. This is not a "hard" but a "soft" file format change. > What I mean here is that there is no syntax change, the new file will be > read by any 1.5.x version, but it will fail because we are adding a new > term (word) unknown to previous versions. You are the linguist so you know > better than me what the problem is. :-)
Yes. I will set up a reversion routine that will transfer this inset to ERT (not really a linguistic problem, actually). Jürgen
