On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 09:30:14AM -0400, rgheck wrote: > > I want quickly to summarize where I think this discussion is now. > > There are two proposals on the table, one due to Bo and one due (more or > less) to me. The details of these have been described elsewhere.
Right. So a possible solution of that dilemma would be to leave the issue to some third person to solve in a way he likes and live with the result or improve on that result,. Andre' PS: I can't resist either... > So the question that seems to me to need answering is this one: Do people > think a sufficient case has been made for Bo's particular proposal, i.e., > for inset-specific embedding? Yes, because it is incidentally what I would have used myself if it would have been available in 1.2.x times. That's also the reason that I lean towards this solution lately irrespective of the social component of the discussion.
