> So a possible solution of that dilemma would be to leave the issue > to some third person to solve in a way he likes and live with the > result or improve on that result,.
This was exactly what I was proposing, but people did not want to step in, I guess for social reasons because the technical side of this debate is quite clear. >> So the question that seems to me to need answering is this one: Do people >> think a sufficient case has been made for Bo's particular proposal, i.e., >> for inset-specific embedding? > > Yes, because it is incidentally what I would have used myself if it >> would have been available in 1.2.x times. That's also the reason that > I lean towards this solution lately irrespective of the social component > of the discussion. Thanks. At least Richard can no longer say that my proposal is useful only to my particular working style. Bo
