Re: Multiple Key Bindings

[rgheck]

Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:

rgheck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

So what about the second part of my question? I ask because we will have
to keep the semantics of these things in the future, and therefore need

it to be sound.

It would overwrite them both. I think that makes sense, semantically.

You mean that only the new binding remains? Yes, it makes sense to me.

Yes. That's right. So good!

rh