>> yes, then we could do that. But note that there'd be no way to manage the >> order of the bindings then, and no indication of what they are. So I'm >> inclined not to allow "adding" a binding via the shortcut panel unless >> those problems are solved. And maybe we could also disallow rebinding a key >> that has multiple bindings. I don't know. This seems to call for listing >> the bindings by key, rather than by LFUN. > > i dont have strong opinion about that. but as is shown above order maybe > important. > >> By the way---this isn't necessarily for you, Pavel---I've noticed some >> oddities in the shortcut dialog while working on this. First, it seems >> bindings from site.bind don't show up in the dialog. They should, at least >> so you know what they are. Attempts to overwrite these bindings seem to >> fail, as well, though they "look" as if they work. For example, if you try >> to bind Shift-Tab to accent-umlaut, it shows up in the panel, but it >> doesn't work. Second, but presumably easier to solve: Hitting "Remove" >> doesn't active "Apply". > > Bo maybe has the idea what going on?
I have not followed the list for a while. I have no idea what \addbind is. The original ideas were that 1. \bind adds a shortcut, there may be many shortcuts for a LFUN. 2. \unbind hides a shortcut. I say 'hide' because system bindings can not be 'removed'. 3. /path/to/lyx/share/bind/site.bind is surpposed to be loaded by default, as well as /path/to/usr/bind/user.bind. I can have a look at the code at the end of this week if needed. Cheers, Bo
