On Wed, Mar 04, 2009 at 01:54:29AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Pavel Sanda <sa...@lyx.org> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bj?nnes wrote: > >> In Fedora 11 the errors might probably be fixed by usinging a more up to > >> date boost (1.38 f.ex.) and --without-included-boost. For all others > >> stuck with an older boost no such luck. So I have a Q: Would you like me > >> to upgrade the included boost to boost 1.38? > > > | the other possibility is that we evetually get rid of boost from our sources > | as discussed few times ago. > > Right... I forgot... Qt app now. > > I think I'll just go and hide beneath my rock again ;-)
No, the idea was that after a while the systems ship a boost that's good enough for LyX's use. If that's still not the case, and boost 1.38 does not hurt otherwise, updating the bundled boost seems a good idea. Andre'
