Kornel Benko wrote: > > The problem is that I have to give it a file extension to make Python > > recognize it. When I do this also the problem I had with missing includes > > disappears. > > You mean, calling python <path to elyxer> is not sufficient?
it is, but the question was different - is it possible to run "elyxer" as executable without any extension win? i think its not. > ... > > "elyxhtml" implies that it is not HTML. To avoid such misinterpretations, > > we use for PDF output pdf2, pdf3, and so on. This works well and I > > therefore would like to have it for HTML accordingly (html is tex4ht, html2 > > is eLyXer). > > May I repeat my proposal? > http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org/msg148941.html how is it different from Uwe's vision? pavel
