On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Allan Rae wrote:
> Good news... I'll apply it to my tree.
>
> and then I'll do the stuff below:
>
> > An alternative fix would be by making
> > Signal1<void, bool> updateBufferDependent;
> >
> > Such that true == "buffer change", and false == "same buffer".
>
> [...]
>
> There are a few things that'll be easy to clean up before I commit it.
> (mostly related to redefining the updateBufferDepedent signal)
I've run out of time and have to go out tonight so you'll just have to
wait till tomorrow.
Allan. (ARRae)
