Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, 12 Oct 2000, Jose Abilio Oliveira Matos wrote:
| > On Thu, Oct 12, 2000 at 02:00:01PM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
| > > >>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > >
| > > Angus> needless to say, there's no vsnprintf on my system.
| > >
| > > It seems to be a gnu extension (according to the man page).
| >
| > According to mine: man 3 printf
| >
| > The fprintf, printf, sprintf, vprintf, vfprintf, and vsprintf
| > functions conform to ANSI C3.159-1989 (`ANSI C'') and ISO/IEC
| > 9899:1999 (`ISO C99''). The snprintf and vsnprintf functions
| > conform to ISO/IEC 9899:1999.
| >
| > I don't think that ISO C99 should be called a gnu extension. ;-)
| > You are lucky to have said that today, if it was tomorrow friday 13
| > I don't know what the consequences would be...
|
| you're giving me the heebie jeebies...
|
| Pulling himself together:
|
| That's as maybe. For those of us whose <string> is sufficient but who don't
| have vsnprintf, what's the work-around!
To find an implementation of vsnprintf for your system.
Lgb
